The bitcoin development community is divided over a proposal to remove certain guardrails designed to deter the use of its blockchain for storing arbitrary data (or ‘spam’). Some developers argue that this change will impact the future of bitcoin, while others assert that it is already happening.
Facilitating Spam Attacks or Nothing Burger? Drama Ensues Over Changes to This Bitcoin Guardrail Feature
WRITTEN BY
SHARE
‘Spam’ Drama Grows: Is Bitcoin Destined to Save ‘Non-Monetary’ Data?
A proposal made by Peter Todd, a bitcoin developer, that seeks to drop the limits established to deter the use of the bitcoin blockchain for “non-monetary” purposes (referred to as spam by some) has split the bitcoin community in half, with Op_Return and its utilization at the center.
The proposal would lift these limits, due to the current utilization of other workarounds by other developers that sidestep this guardrail, according to Chaincode Labs’ Antoine Poinsot. One of these would be Clementine, Citrea’s recently announced bridge.
Read more: Citrea Deploys Complete BitVM Bridge Design on Testnet, Furthering Bitcoin’s DeFi Applications
In support of his proposal, Todd argued that these measures were “easily bypassed by both direct submission to miner mempools (e.g. MARA Slipstream), and forks of Bitcoin Core that do not enforce them (e.g. Libre Relay).” Furthermore, other protocols were also resorting to alternative ways to store data on the bitcoin chain.
However, others believe that, if passed, this would end bitcoin. Jason Hughes, Development and Engineering VP at Ocean Mining, is part of this group. Hughes stressed that Core developers were “about to merge a change that turns Bitcoin into a worthless altcoin, and no one seems to care to do anything about it.”
Hughes called to abandon Bitcoin Core if this change is merged, calling relevant mining pools to step up and reject the changes. “I don’t care what you move to as long as it’s a codebase that doesn’t outright kill Bitcoin,” he concluded.
Read more: Jack Dorsey Backed Bitcoin Mining Pool Ocean Acknowledges Filtering Ordinal Inscriptions
Taproot Wizards’ Udi Wertheimer called out Ocean Mining for harassing developers on Github. Wertheimer stated:
Their entire marketing strategy is harassing a bunch of young men and women who are trying their best to do valuable work (at way-below-market-rates, if not entirely voluntarily).
“ Bitcoin will be fine. If it was as brittle as changing unconfirmed transaction relay policy would break it, it would not be interesting in the first place,” noted Poinsot, referring to the sturdiness of the protocol.
