News

Digital Securities Brokers May Not Be Subject to Enforcement for 5 Years, Says US Regulator

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a statement and is looking for public comment toward the custody of digital asset securities that have been handled by special purpose broker-dealers. The statement from the SEC follows the recent crackdown against Ripple Labs and the subsequent delisting of XRP on various platforms.

Ever since the SEC announced it was suing the company Ripple and the top two executives, the crypto-asset XRP dropped significantly in value. Moreover, since the SEC announcement, three cryptocurrency exchanges such as OSL, Crosstower, and Beaxy have all dropped XRP from the platforms. Furthermore, Bitwise investment fund also decided to sell it’s XRP holdings after the SEC lawsuit as the fund’s portfolio held close to 4% in XRP.

On December 23, the SEC issued a statement concerning the custody of digital asset securities that have been handled by broker-dealers. The government entity released the statement in order to “encourage innovation around the application of Securities Exchange Act Rule 15c3-3 to digital asset securities.”

Essentially for a period of five years, some brokers that have dealt with digital securities and provide customers with certain disclosures may not see enforcement against them.

“For a period of five years, a broker-dealer operating under the circumstances set forth in the statement will not be subject to a Commission enforcement action on the basis that the broker-dealer deems itself to have obtained and maintained physical possession or control of customer fully paid and excess margin digital asset securities for the purposes of paragraph (b)(1) of Rule 15c3-3,” the SEC statement details.

The U.S. regulator adds:

These circumstances, among other things, include that the broker-dealer limits its business to digital asset securities, establishes and implements policies and procedures reasonably designed to mitigate the risks associated with conducting a business in digital asset securities, and provides customers with certain disclosures regarding the risks of engaging in transactions involving digital asset securities.

The U.S. financial watchdog also said that the government entity is “requesting comment” in order to gain insight into the “evolving standards and best practices,” in regard to digital asset securities custody.

The SEC has been cracking down on the crypto industry for quite some time, and charged the blockchain company Block.one for conducting an unregistered initial coin offering of digital tokens (ICO). Block.one settled the charges by paying a $24 million civil penalty, the U.S. regulator detailed last year.

In addition to the exchanges and Bitwise dropping XRP, The Block’s contributor Frank Chaparro detailed on Wednesday, Mike Novogratz’s Galaxy Digital and the firm Jump Trading allegedly decided to stop dealing in XRP since the SEC charges, according to sources. Following the SEC’s statement, however, other platforms may decide not to drop XRP going forward.

“The Commission welcomes engagement from interested parties on these issues,” the U.S. regulator concluded.

What do you think about the SEC’s recent statement toward special purpose broker-dealers who deal with digital currency securities? Let us know what you think in the comments section below.

Tags in this story
5 years, block.one, broker-dealers, digital asset securities, digital securities, EOS, EOS Token Sale, Finance, financial watchdog, five years, Galaxy Digital, Jump Trading, Ripple Labs, special purpose broker-dealers, The SEC, U.S. Regulator, XRP, XRP Sale, XRP sales

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Spot-markets for Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ripple, Litecoin and more. Start your trading here.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Read disclaimer
Show comments