Bit Global has filed a $1 billion lawsuit against Coinbase, alleging anticompetitive practices following the delisting of the wrapped Bitcoin token (WBTC) from the exchange. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, accuses Coinbase of exploiting its dominant position in the market to favor its own product, cbBTC.
Bit Global Files $1 Billion Lawsuit Against Coinbase Over WBTC Delisting
This article was published more than a year ago. Some information may no longer be current.

Coinbase Faces Legal Action From Bit Global
Bit Global claims Coinbase’s actions represent a violation of state and federal antitrust laws, undermining consumer choice and innovation within the cryptocurrency industry. The suit alleges that Coinbase delisted WBTC without providing a transparent explanation, while aggressively promoting cbBTC as a direct competitor. This move, according to the filing, was designed to erode confidence in WBTC and redirect liquidity toward Coinbase’s proprietary offering.
The timing of Coinbase’s decision to delist WBTC—announced in November 2024, just two months after launching cbBTC—has raised suspicions. Bit Global argues that the delisting was part of a broader strategy to monopolize the wrapped bitcoin market, leveraging Coinbase’s influence as a leading cryptocurrency exchange. The lawsuit points out that Coinbase failed to articulate how WBTC fell short of its “listing standards,” while continuing to list highly speculative “ meme coins” that lack fundamental value.
Wrapped Bitcoin, a tokenized version of bitcoin ( BTC) designed to operate on blockchain networks like Ethereum, plays a role in decentralized finance ( defi) by enabling BTC holders to participate in defi platforms. WBTC has become one of the most widely used wrapped bitcoin products, representing over $13 billion in value. Bit Global asserts that Coinbase’s decision to delist WBTC undermines the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem by restricting consumer access to a well-established token.
The lawsuit draws parallels to historical antitrust cases, describing Coinbase’s actions as consistent with the “copy-and-crush” tactics used by dominant tech companies. Bit Global further accuses Coinbase of spreading misinformation about WBTC to sow doubt among users—a tactic referred to as “FUD” (fear, uncertainty, and doubt). This approach, the suit alleges, is intended to solidify cbBTC’s position as the primary wrapped bitcoin token available on the exchange.
Coinbase, which holds a significant market share among U.S. cryptocurrency exchanges, has not yet publicly responded to the lawsuit. However, the case could set a precedent for how centralized exchanges balance their role as gatekeepers with fair competition and innovation.
Bit Global has called for judicial intervention to prevent what it sees as Coinbase’s unchecked expansion into adjacent markets. “This lawsuit seeks to right this wrong and give the choice back to consumers. It seeks to prevent another corporate giant from knocking off cryptocurrency applications developed by others one-by-one only to absorb them into itself,” the complaint concludes.














