Powered by
Legal

Avraham Eisenberg Seeks Acquittal of Mango Markets Conviction

This article was published more than a year ago. Some information may no longer be current.

Avraham “Avi” Eisenberg, who was previously convicted of commodities fraud, commodities manipulation, and wire fraud related to his trading activities on Mango Markets, is pushing for his conviction to be cleared. Eisenberg’s legal team has filed a motion for judgment of acquittal or, alternatively, a new trial, citing several legal and evidentiary flaws in the prosecution.

WRITTEN BY
SHARE
Avraham Eisenberg Seeks Acquittal of Mango Markets Conviction

Eisenberg’s Defense Claims Fundamental Errors in Mango Markets Fraud Case

Eisenberg’s legal team argues that the initial trial was riddled with fundamental errors that render the conviction unsound. They claim that the government failed to prove that the commodities involved in the case fell under the jurisdiction of the Commodities Exchange Act (CEA). Specifically, the defense asserts that the MNGO Perpetual contracts, which were central to the charges, do not qualify as swaps or mixed swaps under the CEA, thus undermining the basis of the prosecution’s case.

Additionally, the defense maintains that the government did not establish that any acts constituting the alleged crimes occurred within the Southern District of New York (SDNY), where the trial was held, calling into question the appropriateness of the venue. In their motion, Eisenberg’s attorneys also challenge the sufficiency of the evidence presented at trial. They argue that the prosecution failed to demonstrate that Eisenberg intended to manipulate the market or deceive Mango Markets.

The defense contends that Mango Markets, as a decentralized exchange, could not have been deceived in the manner alleged because the protocol executed trades automatically, without discretion. Furthermore, they assert that the prosecution did not prove that Eisenberg used an interstate wire, as required for the wire fraud charge. The motion highlights that no evidence was provided to show that any relevant wires originated, passed through, or terminated in the SDNY district.

What do you think about the defense’s argument? Share your thoughts and opinions about this subject in the comments section below.


Bitcoin.com News is seeking a News Writer to produce daily content on cryptocurrency, blockchain, and the digital currency ecosystem. If you are interested in becoming a key member of our innovative global team, apply here.