California Passes Bill Defining Blockchain and Crypto Terms – Regulation Bitcoin News


California Passes Bill Defining Blockchain and Crypto Terms

A draft law designed to amend California’s legislation to create legal grounds for the implementation of crypto-related technologies has been passed by the state’s legislature. Assembly Bill 2658 amends the California Civil Code, Government Code, Corporations Code, and Insurance Code to legalize the use of blockchain secured data and smart contracts in local and foreign commerce. The document contains important definitions of some key blockchain and crypto terms.

Also read: New Bill Clarifies Crypto Taxation in Poland

California State Legislature Adopts DLT Bill

California democrat, 32-year old Assembly member Ian Calderon has scored a notable success in his efforts to push through a draft defining basic terms related to cryptocurrencies and the underlying distributed ledger technology (DLT). The state’s legislature has recently passed his Assembly Bill 2658 which introduces legal definitions of “blockchain technology” and “smart contract”, and revises others like “electronic record” and “electronic signature” to legalize and facilitate record keeping using DLT. The draft is co-sponsored by Senate democrat Bob Hertzberg.

Several important laws will be amended through the adoption of the bill. This will include changes of the provisions of Sections 1624.5 and 1633.2 and adding a new Section 1633.75 to the state’s Civil Code. The act also amends Section 25612.5 of the Corporations Code, Section 16.5 of the Government Code, and Section 38.6 of the Insurance Code relating to electronic records.

California Passes Bill Defining Blockchain and Crypto Terms

The existing Uniform Electronic Transactions Act of California specifies that a record or signature may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because they are in electronic form. It also states that a contract may not be denied legal effect or enforceability only because an electronic record was used in its formation. The act clarifies that if a law requires a record to be in writing, or if it requires a signature, an electronic record or signature should satisfy the law.

Bill 2658 aims to revise provisions of the act that define “electronic record” and “electronic signature” to include a record or a signature secured through blockchain technology. It would also add the term “smart contract” to the legal definition of “contract.” Additionally, the draft specifies that a person who uses blockchain technology to secure information in relation to interstate or foreign commerce retains the same rights of ownership and use as before the data was secured with a distributed ledger.

‘Blockchain Technology Provides Uncensored Truth’

California Passes Bill Defining Blockchain and Crypto Terms
Ian Calderon

The introduction of legal definitions describing key terms related to DLT technologies and cryptocurrencies, in general, is a major merit of Calderon’s bill. One of the important new provisions states that “Blockchain technology means distributed ledger technology that uses a distributed, decentralized, shared, and reciprocal ledger, that may be public or private, permissioned or permissionless, or driven by tokenized crypto economics or tokenless.” Clause (c) added to Section 1633.2 of the California Civil Code reads that “the data on the ledger is protected with cryptography, immutable, auditable, and “provides an uncensored truth.”

Another new text, 1633.2 (p), defines the term “smart contract” as “an event-driven program that runs on a distributed, decentralized, shared, and replicated ledger that can take custody over, and instruct transfer of, assets on that ledger.” And in 1633.2 (e) of the revised act, the authors of the amendments have made it clear that “Contract”, as defined in the law, includes smart contracts. Additions to section 1633.2 (h) and (i) of the Civil Code now note that “A record that is secured through blockchain technology is an electronic record” and “A signature that is secured through blockchain technology is an electronic signature.”

Bill 2658 has been passed in the state’s Senate, on August 23 and in the Assembly, on August 27, after both houses made several amendments since it was introduced in the California legislature earlier this year. To become law, it needs to be signed by Governor Jerry Brown.

What do you think about the new bill? Share your opinions on the subject in the comments section below.

Images courtesy of Shutterstock.

Tags in this story
amendments, Assembly, bill, Blockchain, blockchain technology, california, Cryptocurrencies, Cryptocurrency, cryptos, DIstributed Ledger, draft, draft law, Electronic Signatures, Law, Laws, Legislation, N-Economy, Regulation, Regulations, Senate, Smart Contracts, Tokens

Make sure you do not miss any important Bitcoin-related news! Follow our news feed any which way you prefer; via Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, RSS or email (scroll down to the bottom of this page to subscribe). We’ve got daily, weekly and quarterly summaries in newsletter form. Bitcoin never sleeps. Neither do we.

Lubomir Tassev

Lubomir Tassev is a journalist from tech-savvy Eastern Europe who likes Hitchens’s quote: “Being a writer is what I am, rather than what I do.” Besides crypto, blockchain and fintech, international politics and economics are two other sources of inspiration.

Show comments